Canon & Canonical Interpretation: Köstenberger & Patterson

Köstenberger and Patterson distinguish their Invitation to Biblical Hermeneutics by dealing with special hermeneutics first, and then moving into general hermeneutics. This approach is grounded in the conception of Scripture as “theodrama,” and results in starting with the canon, rather than with the individual words in a particular book.[1] They point out that those who … Continue reading Canon & Canonical Interpretation: Köstenberger & Patterson

Does Paratext Matter?

Paratext can be defined as “everything in a text other than the words.”[1] In other words, anything surrounding or related to a published text other than the words of the text itself. Paratext adds significance, if not meaning, to a written text, bringing about a final form for public reading. The theory of paratext is … Continue reading Does Paratext Matter?

Literary Context: Psalter as Analogous to Canon

A canonical approach to the Bible includes the presupposition that the Bible has at least a theological unity, if not a literary unity. The theological unity is presupposed in the very idea of canon—the collection of God’s self-revelation. A literary unity is also presupposed in the very idea of canon, because the recognition of books … Continue reading Literary Context: Psalter as Analogous to Canon

Musings on Canonical Order

There are two streams of thought that combine to bring the order of the Old Testament canon into view. First, there appears to be widespread recognition that paratext influences biblical interpretation. Paratext includes everything related to the text apart from the actual words of the text.[1] This recognition shows up in the widespread popularity of … Continue reading Musings on Canonical Order